|



| |
Star Trek
Okay, so I guess now that I have this page
on my site I am officially a geek.
Still, there are few stories that have
created such a following. Even in our own military and space programs, it has
become a tradition to name the first of each new type of vessel "The
Enterprise." Aircraft carriers...the first space shuttle, even. I understand the
appeal. All stories are a form of alternate reality that give voice to our
wishful thinking. For many folks - like the show's writers - that wishful
thinking includes a utopian vision of the future...a future that includes space
ships that ply their way with warp drive engines that fold space the way
Einstein and Hawking and Sagan (and most of their drinking buddies) have said is
theoretically possible.
For
me, the appeal of Star Trek is in the fact that I do see wider-spread space
travel happening soon. Designer
Burt Rutan and His Corporate Sponsor Virgin Atlantic (picture
is of their Space Ship One) are already
building and flying successful civilian space craft that they promise to make
available commercially within the very near future. I believe that space tourism
will follow their path - that of private, um...enterprise - rather than NASA's. NASA
has too much government baggage to carry with it to make great strides of
progress. Private enterprise, as ever, needs only the will of people with the means
to finance it...and who among those people (or any of us) does not have the dream
of traveling into space? Personally, I expect it to be possible within my
lifetime to spend the same money as the cost of summiting Everest to buy a few
days on a moon-based resort sipping martinis at an Earth-rise.
And
from there space commerce can only follow, perhaps in the form of Mars-mining or
the like. Perhaps we will discover an indestructible "Reardon" metal there too.
Who knows? Yes, from there we are likely to have star wars too, as
nations and pirates battle for supremacy over this new frontier and all its
associated resources. Lamentable as some of that is, it is the dichotomous
nature of man that with progress comes a degree of stupidity. C'est la vie.
But I digress, the crux of this page is
that space travel will happen, and Star Trek is as well-developed a vision for
that future as we currently have...and I like exploring those possibilities as
much as they do. The degree of specifics in their mythology (told with an
evident reverence for future history) and the development of their
characters is very detail-oriented. Yes, every now and again they include some
pretty silly costumes and the acting occasionally leans cheezy. But if you can
look past all that and Shatner's gut girdle, it's a fun ride.

While they are usually very insightful,
they have missed the mark on the singularly fundamental push-pull of human
society building: that of Capitalism vs. socialism. Unfortunately, they blow it
on that score when they proclaim repeatedly that they have "outgrown the need
for money" and that people now work "for the sole purpose of improving
themselves as people - betterment for its own sake." Lenin and Stalin; Ho Chi
Min, and scores of other socialists thought the same thing too. While that might
start as a nice idea, all of them have failed to realize (as all pie-in-the-sky
liberals do) at least two things:
- 1). Money is not a bad thing. Quite the
opposite, in fact. It is the
way that society rewards you for your contributions to it - in measure to the
degree of your contribution. And that is what keeps society from degenerating
into a system whereby the only way to get you to contribute is through
force...which is precisely what happens when societies try to paint money as
an evil thing, as the socialists and communists do. That is why such
philosophies always give rise to oppressive regimes...they always
become brutal. They have to because, without money, they must force people to
work and then take what they produce. That's why freedom cannot exist without
capitalism...and that's why they call it a "free market."
-
- 2). Star Trek writers have
underestimated the laziness of people who do not have to work, just as Lenin
did and as modern socialist-democrats do when they perpetuate the Welfare
State. When people don't have to work, most will not see that as "the freedom
to better themselves." Never mind the fact that we do better ourselves through
the struggle of the wage earning process. Some would see a "wage-free" world
as an opportunity to pursue learning, etc for its own sake, and would continue
to contribute to their world just because they feel the need to
self-actualize, as Maslow called it. The wise would do all this - but they
by definition are always in the vast minority. The vast majority
would see this as an opportunity to eat bon-bons while watching Oprah all day
and living off their neighbors' tax payments. That's money that those
neighbors worked for and earned to provide for their own families. Hardly a
picture of utopian freedom. We have enough "welfare" families who exhibit
proof of this tendency already. No, a wage-less world would fall into
disrepair and actually regress backwards to stone age living standards
pretty quickly because of the laziness of the average man, the way it did in
Atlas Shrugged.
Having said that, I usually do like the way
the show tackles real life in their story lines, and they usually get it very
right when they metaphorically comment on social issues. Like when they showed
how asinine racism is when they had those two people on board from a planet
where people are white on one side and black on the other.
They
go through the whole episode trying to kill each other and only at the end do we
the viewers realize that one is black on the left side and the other is black on
the right. We hadn't even noticed, and when they tell us the source of their
hatred we all said "so what?" Then we got it.
And I like the way the Federation / Klingon
relationship resembles the cycles of our U.S. / Soviet Cold War; and the way the
Romulans are likened to Nazi Germany and how they and their cousins the Vulcans
reunified, a la East and West Germany when the wall came down. There are
countless other examples...most of which came before their time in an exhibition
of pretty cool vision.
I
also always liked the military structure of the show. They have always had a
pretty well-developed idea of leadership in tough situations; and their
less-than-perfect solutions and equivocal moral dilemmas that leaders are forced
by circumstance to act upon made them more than caricatures. Even the rank
structure lent a disciplined organization to their story lines, that I confess
was part of the appeal of the military service for me...but I'm still waiting
for the right time to say to a subordinate "make it so" without sounding like a
geek. I guess only Captain Picard can pull that off (**sigh**)
I like the way they have been able to avoid
becoming one-dimensional in their treatment of social philosophies. By that I
mean, for example, that while they treat money socialistically (as I mentioned
above) they are not willing to jump into bed with every additional liberal idea
just because most liberals take their philosophies as a packaged set that always
go together. As an example, un-like liberals, they seem to esteem
military discipline and to understand that resorting to arms when faced with a
persistently aggressive foe is often a necessary part of responsible leadership
and the protection of others.
Also unusual in the Hollywood, Left Coast
culture, their characters didn't take the typical "if it feels good do it"
approach...rather they valued striving and hard work towards a difficult goal
even if doing so proved unpleasant; and even more they showed moral judgment as
the positive thing that it is (good judgment, after all, is a part of the
definition of maturity and a big part of what separates us from animals) rather
than treat it as most Hollywood leftists and liberals do.
But beyond all that...I just LOVE
The Enterprise as a ship! I mean, it's ridiculously cool, and it's awesome to
see it swoop through the galaxy!
Star Trek Links
My
"Space" Pages

|